The Rolex Ref. 59. The very name evokes a sense of mystery and intrigue amongst collectors. Unlike the iconic Submariner, Daytona, or Datejust, the reference 59 isn't a readily identifiable model etched into the annals of Rolex history. This scarcity, coupled with limited information readily available, fuels speculation and makes it a highly sought-after piece for those dedicated to unearthing the hidden gems within Rolex's vast and complex heritage. This article delves into the enigma surrounding the Rolex Ref. 59, exploring what we know, what we suspect, and the challenges in definitively categorizing this elusive reference.
The initial search, as indicated by the prompt's mention of "36 results for Rolex 59," highlights the challenge. A simple online search yields a dispersed collection of information, often fragmented and lacking definitive confirmation. Many results point towards the Rolex caliber 59, a movement used across several models but not necessarily associated with a specific "Ref. 59" designation. This underscores the core problem – the lack of a clear, officially documented Rolex Ref. 59.
The confusion is compounded by the potential for misidentification and the fluidity of reference numbers within vintage Rolex circles. Collectors and enthusiasts frequently employ informal reference numbers based on observed characteristics, leading to discrepancies and overlaps. A watch might be referred to by different numbers depending on the source, further obfuscating the search for a definitive "Ref. 59."
The Rolex Caliber 59 Question:
The heart of the matter often lies in the Rolex caliber 59. This movement, a significant piece of Rolex's horological history, was produced in various iterations and employed in a range of models, primarily from the late 1940s and early 1950s. Understanding the caliber 59 is crucial in understanding the potential context of a "Ref. 59" watch. It's a manually wound movement known for its robustness and precision, representing a crucial stage in Rolex's development before the widespread adoption of automatic movements. Its characteristics – size, finishing, and specific features – can help narrow down the potential candidates for a watch possibly identified as a "Ref. 59."
However, simply possessing a caliber 59 movement doesn't automatically equate to a "Ref. 59." Many vintage Rolex watches housed this movement, and without further evidence, assigning a specific reference number based solely on the caliber is unreliable. This highlights the need for meticulous research and careful examination of the watch's case, dial, hands, and other components to establish its authenticity and potential reference.
Tudor, Rolex, and the Blurred Lines:
The mention of a "Tudor Rolex gents watch Ref 768 1948, Cal 59" introduces another layer of complexity. Tudor, a sister company to Rolex, often used Rolex movements in its watches, blurring the lines between the two brands, especially in the vintage era. A Tudor watch with a caliber 59 movement is not uncommon, and the reference number 768 further emphasizes the diversity of model designations and the lack of a consistent naming convention across the brands. This highlights the importance of distinguishing between Tudor and Rolex models when discussing vintage watches with caliber 59 movements. The presence of a caliber 59 in a Tudor watch doesn't automatically invalidate the possibility of a similar Rolex model existing, but it reinforces the need for careful verification and detailed examination.
current url：https://ozqlba.e513c.com/bag/rolex-ref-59-16717